Eco-Shopping.co.uk https://eco-shopping.co.uk Checkout Best Eco-Friendly Products At Lowest Price Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:18:25 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/eco-shopping-fev-100x100.png Eco-Shopping.co.uk https://eco-shopping.co.uk 32 32 It’s Time To Switch To Plastic-Free Chewing Gum https://eco-shopping.co.uk/its-time-to-switch-to-plastic-free-chewing-gum/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/its-time-to-switch-to-plastic-free-chewing-gum/#respond Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:18:18 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/its-time-to-switch-to-plastic-free-chewing-gum/

Chewing gum: We munch on it to freshen our breath, reduce boredom, or weaken cravings. Whether you’re a gum-snapper, a bubble-blower, or a more reserved gum-chewer, you’re probably chewing on a material that’s polluting our landscapes and waterways. That’s right, most chewing gum contains plastic.

People have been chewing on stuff for thousands of years. History.com tells us that people from northern Europe munched on birch bark tar. The Mayans chewed on chicle, a material extracted from the sapodilla tree. Native Americans — and later, European settlers — chewed on spruce tree resin. These were all naturally chewy things with organic origins.

In the U.S., chicle-based chewing gum was popularized in the late 1800s but by the 1940s, chicle was largely replaced by synthetics. Today, most of the gum on the market gets its elasticity and chewy-ness from plastics. Sometimes the plastic base is polyethylene, the plastic used to make most plastic bags. Another plastic used in gum is polyisobutylene, which is used to make inner tubes. The “ick” factor aside, if you’re trying to eliminate single-use plastics from your life, take a look at chewing gum.

This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase an item through one of these links, we receive a small commission that helps fund our Recycling Directory.

Not All Gum Contains Plastic

Fortunately, there are plastic-free alternatives, although you might not find them in your local supermarket yet. Some of these brands are rather obscure and you’ll have to place an order directly from their websites. Others you might find locally and several brands are available on Amazon.

Most plastic-free gum brands state that their gum base contains chicle — the chewy stuff that Mayans chewed on years ago. In addition, many of the plastic-free brands we found sweeten the gum with xylitol, a natural sweetener that fights cavities, derived from the bark of birch and beech trees. These brands also may state that their gum is biodegradable, kosher, plant-based, GMO-free, vegan, or even palm-oil-free. A lot of the ingredients are similar among these natural chewing gum brands, but they all claim to be free of plastic.

Most of the gum on the market today gets its elasticity from plastic. Photo: Edu Carvalho, Pexels

Plastic-free Gum Options

Chicza is a company with one focus: natural, plastic-free chewing gum. What sets the brand apart is that all its ingredients are organic and the gum base is 100% chicle, sustainably harvested from rainforests. It claims that the other natural gum brands do not use only chicle in their gum base. It’s available in mint, cinnamon, and mixed berry flavors. BUY Chicza gum on Amazon

Woman-founded Simply makes a variety of natural candies as well as plastic-free gum made with a chicle gum base. Made in the U.S.A., Simply gum is sweetened with organic sugar cane and comes in unique flavors including maple, coffee, fennel, pumpkin spice, and one flavor that’s a combination of grapefruit, prickly pear, cayenne, and sea salt. BUY Simply gum on Amazon

Glee Gum is made with sustainably harvested rainforest chicle and packaged in recyclable materials. Non-GMO cane sugar and brown rice syrup sweeten classic Glee Gum; the sugar-free version is sweetened with xylitol. Glee is more widely distributed throughout the U.S. than some plastic-free gum brands, so you might find it in a local grocery store. BUY Glee Gum on Amazon

The Humble Co. is a Swedish-based company founded by dentists working against plastic waste and helping lower-income communities with dental health. In addition to dental-care products such as toothpaste and floss, it sells xylitol-sweetened gum in mint, tropical fruit, and berry flavors. The ingredients don’t list the source of its “natural gum base,” but the website says it “comes from trees.” BUY The Humble Co. gum on Amazon

The first natural gum company in the U.K., Chewsy gum is yet another chicle-based, plastic-free chewing gum. The gum is sugar-free, naturally sweetened with xylitol, and comes in peppermint, cinnamon, spearmint, and lemon flavors. BUY Chewsy on Amazon

More Plastic-free Gum Brands

  • Milliways is a London-based company that makes chicle-based gum in flavors such as mint, bubblemint, and watermelon. Its packaging is also plastic-free.
  • The woman-owned brand Oh My Gum! uses chicle in the gum base and also uses plastic-free recyclable cardboard in its packaging. It’s available in the U.K. as well as France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, and Austria.
  • Nuud is based in the U.K. and, like Oh My Gum, does not use any plastic in its packaging. Like the other brands, its “natural gum base” includes chicle.
  • Based in Copenhagen, True Gum chicle-based gum comes in interesting flavors like Raspberry & Vanilla, Ginger & Tumeric, and Liquorice & Eucalyptus.
Man stepped in chewing gum
As more of us work towards eliminating plastic from our lives, avoiding plastic chewing gum is an easy change to make.

Let Companies Hear Your Voice

These are just a few of the plastic-free gum brands out there. As more consumers request plastic-free gum, manufacturers will respond with more options. Our purchasing habits are a great way to influence businesses, so buy gum that aligns with your values. If there’s a gum brand you’ve stopped buying because it doesn’t offer a plastic-free option, let the company know why you’ve stopped buying its product.

Plastic pollution is a worldwide crisis. As more of us work towards eliminating plastic from our lives, avoiding plastic chewing gum is an easy change to make. Who wants to chew on plastic anyway?

Originally published on June 30, 2022, this article was updated in February 2023.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/its-time-to-switch-to-plastic-free-chewing-gum/feed/ 0
We Earthlings: More Green Spaces https://eco-shopping.co.uk/we-earthlings-more-green-spaces/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/we-earthlings-more-green-spaces/#respond Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:12:39 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/we-earthlings-more-green-spaces/

The need for green spaces in urban areas increases as climate change continues to warm our planet and extreme weather events become more frequent.

Human-made structures like dark asphalt roadways, cement sidewalks, and brick buildings absorb heat, contributing to the heat island effect. Trees and plants provide much-needed shade and cool the air through a process called evapotranspiration, which helps alleviate the heat island effect. During heat waves, urban vegetation plays a key role in making our cities habitable.

As our warming climate causes sea level rise, more frequent hurricanes, and heavier rainfall, the paved urban environment is at higher risk of flooding. Trees and other plants help manage runoff and protect against erosion.

Learn more about the benefits that green spaces provide and let your city officials know why your city needs more green spaces.

Print or share We Earthling posters to inspire others with your stories.

 

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/we-earthlings-more-green-spaces/feed/ 0
Natural Burial for a Greener Afterlife https://eco-shopping.co.uk/natural-burial-for-a-greener-afterlife/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/natural-burial-for-a-greener-afterlife/#respond Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:00:41 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/natural-burial-for-a-greener-afterlife/

For most of human history, natural burial was the only option. Then, in the 20th century, toxin-laden embalming practices and air-polluting cremation methods became mainstream. Today, no matter how sustainably you have lived your life, modern funeral practices ensure that you make one last giant carbon footprint when you die. In many places, regulations require the use of toxic, persistent chemicals for embalming and concrete vaults for burial. But more and more individuals are looking for ways to die as sustainably as they have lived. And more states are legalizing ecological funeral practices. Green burial options are returning to the mainstream.

Modern Funeral Practices

Conventional modern burial practices are anything but sustainable. They use toxic, persistent chemicals for embalming. About 827,000 gallons of embalming fluid containing formaldehyde leak into soil and groundwater annually. Caskets use the wood from four million square acres of forest each year. Burial vaults and monuments use more than 1.5 million tons of concrete; 104,000 tons of steel; and 2,700 tons of copper and bronze. All told, burials result in 178 tons of carbon dioxide emissions yearly. The Greenest State to Die In report estimates that the average burial generates 250 pounds of greenhouse gas emissions. The same study found that cremation generates more than 530 pounds of greenhouse gas emissions, due to the nonrenewable natural gas that powers crematoria.

Image source

The environmental impact of dying varies by state, primarily based on whether burial or cremation is the more popular funeral choice. However, the availability of more sustainable alternative options can make a difference in how green your death can be. Until recently, most states’ death care laws limited one’s sustainable choices mostly to environmentally friendly uses for cremation ashes, like tree cremains urns and coral reef restoration. But natural burial is on the rise. According to the National Funeral Directors Association, interest in green burial options is up 5% since 2021, with 60% of Americans now open to green burial.

Green Burial

Natural burial, which is also called green burial, refers to a less toxic burial process. In a standard burial, the body is embalmed and put into a metal or lacquered wood casket that is then placed in a concrete burial vault. In a natural burial, the body receives no chemical treatment. It is wrapped in a cotton shroud or placed in a biodegradable casket made of wicker or wood, which is buried directly in the ground where it can naturally decompose.

Some people choose unobtrusive monuments made from native stone that lie flat with the ground. Many natural cemeteries eliminate headstones entirely. Vegetation can completely cover the grave sites and the entire property remains indistinguishable from a natural area. (Individual burial sites are recorded using GPS coordinates so that they can be found.) The Greenest State study estimates natural burial to be climate positive, sequestering about 25 pounds of carbon.

Green Cemeteries

Green burial is legal in every state, however local cemetery regulations may limit the availability of places to perform natural burials. The New Hampshire Funeral Resources & Education website maintains a list of cemeteries that can accommodate natural burials. Cemeteries can take several approaches to natural burial. Conservation burial grounds go beyond natural burial and commit to using burial fees for land acquisition as part of a larger ecological preservation and restoration project. Natural burial grounds will preserve a natural or naturalistic landscape with native vegetation and will avoid pesticides and fertilizers. Hybrid cemeteries are regular cemeteries that have obtained legal authorization to perform natural burials in a special area or throughout the grounds but continue to offer standard burials with vaults as well.

wooden heart by tree trunk

 

Green Funerals

The Green Burial Council certifies funeral homes that meet seven main standards for green burial services. They maintain a list of certified funeral homes on their website. However, certification is not required to offer green burials. Many funeral homes that are not on the list can provide sustainable funeral services and green burials.

Funeral services can be made more sustainable by dressing the deceased in biodegradable clothing instead of synthetic fabrics; using recycled paper products; and offering locally grown, organic flowers and food. Families can ask guests to carpool and may choose to hold the service in a natural setting instead of a funeral home. Once common, few people know that home funerals are still legal. Holding a home funeral allows families to care for the deceased and all aspects of the service and burial. In fact, families who live on large properties in rural areas may be able to perform their own natural burial at home. Most states allow burial on private property. Some states require designation of a piece of land as a family cemetery, and local zoning laws preclude burial in many areas.

Other Options

Some of the most environmentally friendly death care services don’t even involve burial. Aquamation is a heated chemical reaction that leaves behind only bone fragments and a sterile liquid made up of salts, sugars, amino acids, and peptides in water. There are no residual tissues or DNA, so this liquid can be safely discharged as wastewater. Aquamation only generates about 53 pounds of greenhouse gases. Families can claim the bone fragments just as they can for cremains. The Cremation Association of North America maintains a map of regulatory changes that tracks the legalization of aquamation.

Composting, like natural burial, has the potential to be climate positive. However, the first state to legalize it only did so in 2019, so data is limited. Composting is catching on quickly, though, with new states passing laws allowing the practice each year. Human remains are composted individually in honeycomb-like cells (called “cradles” or “vessels”). These cells control the temperature and oxygen level inside. The slowly rotate a clean, efficient mixture of organic materials (including straw and wood chips). The final result is indistinguishable from garden topsoil. Families can choose to collect the soil for their own use, but most choose to donate it. From funeral to garden, the entire process takes about six weeks.

With the return of natural burials and with newer options like aquamation and composting, environmentalists finally have end-of-life choices that pay more than lip service to the idea of becoming one with nature.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/natural-burial-for-a-greener-afterlife/feed/ 0
Helping Future Generations Cover the Cost of a Gallon of Gasoline Today https://eco-shopping.co.uk/helping-future-generations-cover-the-cost-of-a-gallon-of-gasoline-today/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/helping-future-generations-cover-the-cost-of-a-gallon-of-gasoline-today/#respond Sun, 26 Feb 2023 18:59:24 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/helping-future-generations-cover-the-cost-of-a-gallon-of-gasoline-today/

Today’s carbon emitted into the atmosphere adds to the future cost of living through the climate crisis, a concept referred to as the social cost of carbon. To help clarify this abstract idea, we have an idea that lets you help future generations cover the social cost of carbon for the gasoline you use.

At some point, governments or private markets are expected to put a price on carbon, and the future impact of a ton of carbon emitted today will be a key factor in that price. From the cost of carbon removal and climate-related weather or health costs to lost food production and other impacts that raise the cost of living, today’s CO2 emissions come at a high cost for our descendants.

The Biden Administration recently announced new guidance that could raise the future cost of a ton of carbon from $51, the price set in 2021, to $190. This non-binding price is important in recognizing the environmental debt we’re leaving our children, their children, and future generations. The Trump Administration previously set the social cost of 1 ton of carbon at only $8. Several studies, including a September 2022 report in Nature that set the price at $185/ton, have suggested that the actual cost is much higher. On entering the White House, the Biden team set the price at $51.

Now, according to National Public Radio, the Environmental Protection Agency is considering changing its estimate to $190 a ton. Based on the new $190 per-ton price, in 2021 the world’s living generations who emitted 31.5 billion metric tons (or 35.2 billion imperial tons) borrowed $6.68 trillion dollars from future generations, who will have to cover those costs out of their own pockets. And that’s just one year’s emissions. Over the course of the past decade, we’ve front-loaded future costs of more $70 trillion into the cost of living in 2050.

One Simple Idea: Pay the Debt You’re Leaving Your Kids

We don’t have to be like Popeye’s perpetual financial foil, Wimpy, and wait for the EPA’s decision before acting to finance our descendants’ solution. We can act today.

Wimpy borrowed incessantly from the future, but you don’t have to.
Source: Reddit

We suggest that the social cost of a ton of carbon can be the basis for a simple investment strategy that can pay out today’s social cost of carbon to your descendants. This idea addresses a family’s future risk if you keep the money in a directed trust fund, which could specify how the funds can be used. If you’d like to set aside money for societal costs in general, making a charitable gift to a nonprofit that administers these funds for wider social impact, the idea can be extended to all of society.

We can plan ahead by using an easy-to-access U.S. Treasury bond that protects the principal from inflation, the I bond, to set aside money for up to 30 years, when, if we manage to end carbon emissions, the worst impacts of climate change are likely to strike. If you put $1 in today, your beneficiaries will receive $1 plus the accrued interest between five and 30 years in the future, effectively hedging the principal investment — the cash you put in — against inflation.

NerdWallet explains that I bond interest rates are reset by the Department of the Treasury every six months to pay out at a rate that ensures the cash investment is preserved despite rising prices. At this writing, I bonds pay 6.89% (click the percentage to see the current rate). There will be a federal tax due on the interest received over the years if the money is used for anything other than education expenses, which are tax free.

Editor’s note: Earth911 is not an investment advisory and has no economic interest in the recommended strategy. Discuss this idea with your financial advisor before making any decisions.

Think Before You Gas Up

How can we help defray the huge future costs created by the CO2 we emit today? The simplest way to to stop burning fossil fuels and make our economy efficient. But that is a long process that requires worldwide participation.

Instead, think about how you might set aside some funding to help your descendants deal with the cost of climate change. Each time you fill up your gas tank, if you still have an internal combustion vehicle, track the number of gallons. Then, every six months, you can do some simple math to decide how much to invest for your children.

How much should you set aside? There is a reliable formula to use because a gallon of gas always emits the same amount, 19.37 pounds, of carbon dioxide when burned. In other words, a gallon of gas produces 0.009685 tons of CO2, and that can be converted into a dollar value per gallon which, at $190 per ton, is $1.84 per gallon. At the current established social cost of CO2, $51/ton, you’d need to put aside $0.50 per gallon burned. Maybe you’d like to pick a higher or lower social cost per ton of carbon. If so, here’s a quick sample of per-gallon investments you’d need to make:

The social cost per gallon of gas chart
The social cost per gallon of gas.

Two Ways To Make a Quick Social Cost of Your Driving Calculation

Any solution needs to be easy, and we found two ways to make quick work of calculating the social cost of your driving.

You can keep your receipts and add up how many gallons of gas you purchased every six months. To find your future cost of the emissions, multiply the number of gallons by $1.84 to get the total to put into a bond fund — for instance, 65 gallons of gas burned produces 1,259.05 pounds of CO2, which at $190/ton ($1.84/gallon), will cost future generations $119.60.

Or, don’t bother to save receipts and instead record your mileage every six months, subtracting the previous total from the latest mileage reported by your odometer. For example, if you odometer reads 21,300 miles on January 1 and 26,500 on July 1, it’s easy to calculate that you drove 5,200 miles. Divide your miles driven by the EPA’s reported miles per gallon for your vehicle: 5,200 miles driven divided by 22 mpg = 236 gallons of gas. Now, multiply the gallons purchased by $1.84, the per-gallon cost at $190 per ton of CO2 emissions, to find the amount to invest in I bonds: $434.24.

Here’s the formula to convert your gas usage from gallons to the social cost you would need to cover for future generations:

         GALLONS OF GASOLINE PURCHASED * SOCIAL COST PER GALLON = $ to invest in I bonds

The same principle can be applied to any carbon-emitting activity, for example heating your home with natural gas or fossil fuel burned to generate the electricity you use. See our article Carbon Calculating: Estimating Your Home Energy Impact for more information about the emissions factors of other fuels.

The point of this suggestion is not that you must pay this amount to future generations — that’s a decision each of us needs to make for ourselves. We provide this idea as a basis for understanding the impact of driving an internal combustion vehicle on future generations. If we cannot change, let’s consider how to help our children and their children adapt.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/helping-future-generations-cover-the-cost-of-a-gallon-of-gasoline-today/feed/ 0
Corporate Media Fiddle as the Planet Burns https://eco-shopping.co.uk/corporate-media-fiddle-as-the-planet-burns/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/corporate-media-fiddle-as-the-planet-burns/#respond Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:44:46 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/corporate-media-fiddle-as-the-planet-burns/

Editor’s note: We invited Project Censored to highlight five environmental news stories that should have made headlines.

Since its establishment in 1976, Project Censored has tracked pervasive patterns of omission in corporate news coverage, including how the nation’s most prominent news outlets fail to inform the public about systemic social inequalities, consolidation of corporate power, and alternatives to neoliberal economic policies. Important environmental stories are often omitted or covered only partially owing to a combination of these factors.

Although the corporate media do cover environmental issues, these reports seldom emphasize the connections between environmental issues — many of which are global in scope — and the everyday workings of the U.S. economy, which emphasizes corporate pursuit of profits on one hand and a culture of consumerism on the other. Environmental stories that do not fit into a tidy “red versus blue” political framework are even less likely to be covered by the nation’s largest news outlets.

For nearly 50 years, Project Censored has published an annual report on the most important but underreported news stories. These lists, published in our yearbook series and archived on the Project Censored website, demonstrate both the gaps in corporate news reporting and the importance of independent journalism that informs the public about these otherwise neglected issues. (Read our complete explanation of the Project’s story identification and vetting process.)

This year’s story list, published in State of the Free Press 2023, includes five significant environmental stories that were only brought to light by the dogged work and dedication of independent journalists and news outlets. Here we provide the sources of and capsule summaries for each story.

“Smart Ocean” Technology Endangers Whales and Intensifies Climate Change

Koohan Paik-Mander, “Whales Will Save the World’s Climate—Unless the Military Destroys Them First,” BuzzFlash (via the Independent Media Institute’s Local Peace Economy project), December 13, 2021.

Joint military and industry efforts to develop new ocean technologies and infrastructure — which engineers and advocates call the “smart ocean” — will have lethal consequences for whales, significantly undermining their “indispensable role” in sequestering carbon and mitigating climate catastrophe.

A number of corporate news outlets, including Newsweek and Slate, have covered scientific reports on the role of whales in capturing carbon and mitigating climate change. But Koohan Paik-Mander’s report is unusual for showing the links between new “smart ocean” technologies, catastrophic declines in whale populations, and the climate crisis.

Wealthy Nations Continue to Drive Climate Change, With Devastating Impacts on Poorer Countries

Sonja Klinsky, “Climate Change Is a Justice Issue—These 6 Charts Show Why,” The Conversation, November 3, 2021.
Tawanda Karombo, “These African Countries Are Among the World’s Worst Hit by Climate Change,” Quartz Africa, January 27, 2021.

In a November 2021 article for The Conversation, Sonja Klinsky outlined how and why poorer regions of the world are disproportionately affected by climate change. Wealthier nations, such as the U.S., Canada, and Australia, release roughly 100 times the per-capita greenhouse gas emissions as many African countries, yet the impacts of this damage have long fallen on the shoulders of the most vulnerable victims of climate change.

In 2019, according to a Quartz Africa report by Tawanda Karombo in 2021, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and Niger all experienced drastic, unpredictable changes in temperature and precipitation, causing food shortages, economic disasters, and hundreds of avoidable fatalities. These countries bear little responsibility for perilous greenhouse gas emissions but have the fewest resources available to cope with the consequences of climate change.

Corporate news outlets such as Time and the New York Times have started covering environmental racism in the United States. This coverage, however, typically fails to address how the U.S. and other countries in the Global North have effectively “colonized” the global atmosphere, promoting their own economic growth at the expense of basic living conditions in other nations.

At Least 128 Members of Congress Invested in Fossil Fuel Industry

David Moore, “Senators Cling to Fossil Fuel Stocks as World Heats Up,” Sludge, November 5, 2021.
David Moore, “GOP Rep Picks up Millions in Pipeline Stock,” Sludge, December 10, 2021.
David Moore, “At Least 100 House Members Are Invested in Fossil Fuels,” Sludge, December 29, 2021.
Julia Rock and Andrew Perez, “Lauren Boebert’s Anti-Climate Legislation Is a Self-Enrichment Scheme,” Jacobin, September 13, 2021.

At least 100 U.S. Representatives and 28 Senators have financial interests in the fossil fuel industry. While more Republicans than Democrats are invested in the fossil fuel industry, “Senate Democrats own up to $8,604,000 in fossil fuel assets, more than double the Senate Republicans’ $3,994,126 in fossil fuel assets,” David Moore reported. Many of the Congressional leaders with investments hold seats on important committees, multiplying both their influence and the extent of the conflicts between their financial interests as investors and their responsibilities as elected representatives of the public.

Corporate news outlets report that clean energy legislation is “stalled” in Congress, but not the financial conflicts of interest that are the likely cause of this lack of progress.

EPA Withheld Reports on Dangerous Chemicals

Sharon Lerner, “EPA Withheld Reports of Substantial Risk Posed by 1,240 Chemicals,” The Intercept, November 1, 2021.
A. Crunden, “EPA’s Failure to Disclose Chemical Health Risks Draws Ire,” E & E News, January 5, 2022.

Between January 2019 and November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received more than 1,200 legally required disclosures about chemicals that present a “substantial risk of injury to health or the environment.” All but one of EPA’s reports on these chemicals were withheld from the public, Sharon Lerner reported in a November 2021 Intercept article. E.A. Cruden of E&E News was the first to report on a lawsuit filed by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), pressuring the EPA to publicly reveal TCSA section 8(e) reports under the Freedom of Information Act.

Notably, in February 2022, after PEER’s complaint was filed, the EPA announced that it would resume publishing 8(e) substantial risk reports. Had it not been for the work of the Intercept’s Sharon Lerner, EPA whistleblowers would not have had a platform to share concerns that ultimately led the agency to resume these critical public disclosures.

Fossil Fuel Industry Subsidized at Rate of $11 Million per Minute

Damian Carrington, “Fossil Fuel Industry Gets Subsidies of $11M a Minute, IMF Finds,” The Guardian, October 6, 2021.
Eduardo Garcia, “Fossil Fuel Companies Receive $11 Million a Minute in Subsidies, New Report Reveals,” Treehugger, October 21, 2021.

A comprehensive study of 191 nations, published by the International Monetary Fund in September 2021, found that globally the fossil fuel industry receives subsidies of $11 million per minute. Fossil fuel companies received $5.9 trillion in subsidies in 2020, with support projected to rise to $6.4 trillion by 2025, according to the IMF report.

Some of the subsidies are direct — including policies that reduce prices and provide tax exemptions — but the significant majority of subsidies are indirect, including lack of liability for the health costs of deadly pollution and damages caused by extreme weather events linked to climate change.

“It’s critical that governments stop propping up an industry that is in decline,” Mike Coffin, a senior analyst at Carbon Tracker, told the Guardian, which reported that ending fossil fuel subsidies would prevent “nearly a million deaths a year from dirty air” and raise “trillions of dollars for governments.”

As Project Censored finalized its 2021-2022 story list, not one corporate news outlet had covered the IMF’s report on the negative social and environmental consequences of increasingly massive government subsidies for Big Oil.

What Can You Do?

How might our shared prospects for 2023 and beyond look different if the establishment press did a better job of informing the U.S. public about environmental issues? Answers to that question will take time because they depend on systemic changes in corporate news coverage, beginning with more inclusive working definitions of who and what count as “newsworthy.”

In the meantime, beyond calling on corporate news outlets to do better, people seeking trustworthy and engaging journalism should direct their attention — and support — to independent news outlets, such as those highlighted here and in previous editions of Project Censored’s annual story lists. By consistently connecting the dots between corporate influence, consumer culture, and environmental issues, independent news outlets play a vital, if indirect, role in helping to build broad, inclusive movements for progressive social change, including solutions to our most pressing environmental issues.

About the Authors

Andy Lee Roth is associate director of Project Censored, where he coordinates the Project’s Campus Affiliates Program, a research network of several hundred students and faculty at two dozen colleges and universities across North America. He is the coauthor of The Media and Me, a book on critical media literacy for young people.

Mickey Huff is director of Project Censored and coauthor of United States of Distraction, Let’s Agree to Disagree, and The Media and Me. He co-hosts the Project Censored Show and teaches social science, history, and journalism at Diablo Valley College.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/corporate-media-fiddle-as-the-planet-burns/feed/ 0
Earth911 Podcast: Oceanographer John Englander Shares a 2023 Sea Level Rise Update https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth911-podcast-oceanographer-john-englander-shares-a-2023-sea-level-rise-update/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth911-podcast-oceanographer-john-englander-shares-a-2023-sea-level-rise-update/#respond Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:27:42 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth911-podcast-oceanographer-john-englander-shares-a-2023-sea-level-rise-update/

Sea level rise due to melting glaciers on Greenland and in the Arctic and Antarctic could force the relocation of 267 million people and entire cities located less than 2 meters — 6.5 feet — from today’s waterline by 2100. Oceanographer John Englander has raised the alarm about sea level rise in his books, High Tide on Main Street and Moving to Higher Ground. John runs the Rising Seas Institute and leads regular visits to Greenland to spur awareness of the accelerating loss of its glaciers. We talked with him in 2021, when Moving to Higher Ground was released, and he returns to the show to share an update on the pace of warming, the Thwaites Glacier and Ice Shelf in Antarctica, Greenland’s rapid loss of ice, and the preparations necessary for adaptation to a world of constantly rising seas.

John Englander, oceanographer and author of Moving to Higher Ground, is our guest on Sustainability in Your Ear.

NASA warns that continuing warming could raise sea levels by 5 meters (more than 16 feet) by 2300. The early damage will be felt across more than twice the expected coastal land than previously expected, according to a January 2023 Dutch research study published in the journal Earth’s Future, because previous satellite analysis misestimated the altitude of heavily forested land. The potential cost of protecting seaside cities and raising port facilities will run into the trillions of dollars. Perhaps that spending can be an opportunity to rethink our infrastructure comprehensively, but in the midst of a crisis people are not prone to be very forward-looking.

John Englander’s books are available online. Look for “Moving to Higher Ground: Rising Seal Level and the Path Forward” at Amazon and Powell’s Books and “High Tide on Main Street: Rising Sea Level and the Coming Coastal Crisis” (Amazon; Powell’s Books). You can learn more about John and his work at johnenglander.net.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth911-podcast-oceanographer-john-englander-shares-a-2023-sea-level-rise-update/feed/ 0
Earth Action: Become a Sustainable Fashion Influencer https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth-action-become-a-sustainable-fashion-influencer/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth-action-become-a-sustainable-fashion-influencer/#respond Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:48:02 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth-action-become-a-sustainable-fashion-influencer/

Earth911 is honoring the 52 years of Earth Day with 52 Actions for the Earth. Each week through Earth Day 2023, we will share an action you can take to invest in the Earth and make your own life more sustainable. The environmental impact of the global textile and fashion industry is so big that EarthDay.org has made sustainable fashion one of its major campaigns. This week, you can use social media to take action for the Earth by becoming a fashion influencer.

Action: Become a Sustainable Fashion Influencer

Fashion

We’re so used to $10 T-shirts, seasonal trends, and shops that rotate merchandise every two weeks, few of us can imagine a world without fast fashion. The average person today buys 60% more clothing than they did 15 years ago. But they only keep their clothes for half as long. The average garment may be worn as few as 10 times before disposal.

But every aspect of making, selling, and replacing all that disposable clothing has a big environmental impact. The fashion industry is responsible for nearly 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions. Every year, 40 million tons of textiles are disposed – many of them never worn. It takes nearly 3,000 liters of water to make one cotton T-shirt and 3,781 liters of water to make a pair of jeans. Yet cotton, especially organic cotton, is a better fabric choice than synthetics. More than half of our clothes are made of oil-derived synthetic fibers that contribute to 35% of all ocean microplastic pollution. After technology manufacturing, the garment industry is the next leading cause of modern slavery and child labor.

My Planet My Closet

Quitting fast fashion for good and investing in sustainable fashion isn’t easy, especially when social media is overflowing with haul videos and #ootd (outfit of the day) images that encourage a throwaway approach to dressing. You can take inspiration from EarthDay.org’s Fashion for the Earth Ambassadors and shift your own influences by following more sustainable fashion influencers in 2023. But it’s even better to become an influencer for good yourself.

Inspire others with your sustainable wardrobe via EarthDay.org’s My Planet My Closet showcase.

As part of EarthDay.org’s sustainable fashion campaign, they are renewing My Planet My Closet, a showcase for the efforts of regular people to move past fast fashion and develop a more sustainable wardrobe. To participate, make a short MP4 video showing off your sustainable closet, and share it with EarthDay.org. They might use it on Twitter, other social media channels, their web page, or all of the above.

You can follow EarthDay.org’s guidelines and join their campaign or just do your own thing. On the social media platform of your choice, create a video, reel, image, or text post that relates to sustainable fashion. Demonstrate how you reduce the impact of your wardrobe, show off your creative remixes of your capsule wardrobe, or share facts about the environmental impact of the fashion industry. If you know how to mend or recently hosted a clothing swap, make a how-to video or blog about the experience. Read some of Earth911’s articles on making fashion sustainable if you need inspiration, and don’t forget to tag @Earth911!

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/earth-action-become-a-sustainable-fashion-influencer/feed/ 0
PennyLoafer: A Simple Way to Donate to Causes You Care About https://eco-shopping.co.uk/pennyloafer-a-simple-way-to-donate-to-causes-you-care-about/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/pennyloafer-a-simple-way-to-donate-to-causes-you-care-about/#respond Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:08:15 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/pennyloafer-a-simple-way-to-donate-to-causes-you-care-about/

I don’t think I was bad at making donations to environmental charities, but it did feel like something was lacking. I built PennyLoafer to help fill this gap.

Despite our best intentions, a lot of things get in the way of our charitable giving. Maybe we don’t know where to start, or we don’t have time to do the research. We’re busy with school, jobs, kids — with life. We may be skeptical that our giving will truly make a difference, especially on big issues like climate change and the mental health crisis. This was certainly the case for me.

In the summer of 2020, amidst a global pandemic and racial justice movement, I took stock of my giving habits. They seemed disjointed and often reactive. I would donate when crises happened, or requests came my way: a friend’s charity run; a drive for my cousin’s classroom supplies; or supporting a local food pantry during the pandemic. To be sure, it always felt good in the moment, but looking at my donations as a whole, they felt impulsive and it was hard to deduce what I actually valued.

If you can relate to this, know that it’s human. In fact, donors rarely give as much as they intend to and often have trouble explaining a consistent approach to the charities they choose. One study from the Center for Advanced Hindsight found that, on average, people want to give 2.5 times more than they actually do. This difference between intention and action got me curious.

I considered what it would mean to have a giving strategy: What did I care about most? And how could I do more about it strategically and on an ongoing basis?

From that came the idea for PennyLoafer, a platform that makes charitable giving simple and more strategic. We do this by creating ongoing giving strategies around select causes like climate change, with the goal of getting more people donating regularly to causes they care about and learning along the way.

Impact Made Easy – Eliminating Barriers to Charitable Giving

PennyLoafer is designed to address several common barriers to giving:

  1. Choice overload. There are more than a million nonprofits in the U.S. alone. Decision paralysis is a common pitfall. PennyLoafer helps you out by researching and vetting a diverse collection of nonprofits so you can simply start giving based on your priorities, and have one less aspect of your life overwhelmed by choices.
  2. Time. Responsible giving requires time to research issues and charities. People are busy. PennyLoafer builds giving into your life, taking care of logistics and keeping you informed along the way.
  3. Feeling overwhelmed by issues. We’ve all been there: What can one person do to make a difference, especially for complex issues like the climate crisis? With PennyLoafer, our members join other like-minded donors in a giving strategy. Ten dollars a month might not seem like a lot but it quickly adds up when we combine donations.
  4. Unclear impact. You’re not giving into a black hole with PennyLoafer. We keep you updated on the impact of your giving and engaged in the cause via our monthly newsletter.

Keeping Donors Informed About Issues

Perhaps the most important aspect of PennyLoafer is the monthly newsletter. I didn’t want this to be another fund that people can donate to and never really hear anything again. It’s important to me that people feel impactful with their giving, learn about different nonprofits and the various strategies employed to address issues like climate change.

Donors receive consistent feedback every month. The newsletter highlights the selected nonprofit, including its leadership, approach, and why it was chosen. It also shares relevant news and information about the cause. For instance, our climate change newsletter might cover a piece of climate legislation moving through Washington or interesting facts about renewable energy developments.

Since our launch in fall 2021, PennyLoafer donors have sent thousands of dollars to charities fighting climate change across the country. In the process, they’ve learned about a variety of organizations and different ways to address the issue. From national NGOs, such as Carbon180, which works on federal policies that increase funding for carbon removal, to smaller, grassroots nonprofits like Native Renewables, which is bringing solar power to the Navajo Nation.

PennyLoafer world

The Social Venture Model

We made an intentional effort to be accessible and affordable. PennyLoafer does not take a share of donations or charge platform fees. We partner with a 501(c)(3) charity, Charityvest, so that all donations through the platform are tax deductible.

Donors can start by giving as little as $5 a month, and change their regular donation or cancel at any time. Donors also have the option to leave a tip to help PennyLoafer cover our operating expenses. At its core, PennyLoafer is built to get more individual donors meaningfully connected to causes they care about, learning and feeling the difference they make — no matter the amount they can give.

To learn more or start giving regularly to causes that address climate change and other issues, check out pennyloafer.org.

This article was originally published on March 1, 2022.

About the Author

Andi ThiemanAndi Thieman is the founder of PennyLoafer. Her background is in nonprofit consulting and human services. Her career has focused on strategic planning, capacity-building, grant writing, and best practice research for nonprofits and public agencies. She is a Pittsburgh native, currently living in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

 

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/pennyloafer-a-simple-way-to-donate-to-causes-you-care-about/feed/ 0
Creative Companies Upcycling Food – Earth911 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/creative-companies-upcycling-food-earth911/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/creative-companies-upcycling-food-earth911/#respond Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:36:27 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/creative-companies-upcycling-food-earth911/

The cumulative effect of unfinished dinners and salad that wilts in the fridge is almost too big to comprehend. America wastes nearly 40% of all the food it produces, and that has a global impact. There is a lot that we can do to eliminate food waste in our own homes. But a lot of waste takes place before it ever reaches our kitchens. Fortunately, some companies are getting creative with upcycling that waste food.

When referring to food, upcycling is defined as making foods that use ingredients that otherwise would not have gone to human consumption, that are procured and produced using verifiable supply chains, and that have a positive impact on the environment. While the burgeoning imperfect produce sector does not quite fit this definition of upcycling, there are many new ventures that don’t just find higher uses for unmarketable fresh produce, they save food from being entirely wasted.

Do Good Chicken

Do Good Foods is a new company that combats climate change by upcycling surplus grocery food into chicken meat. Each day, the Pennsylvania company collects 160 tons of grocery surplus from around 450 grocery stores. They convert the collected meat and produce into a nutrient-dense animal feed supplement. Chickens grown on this diet will become available in grocery stores in early 2022. Each chicken consumes up to four pounds of surplus, which saves three pounds of greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventionally raised chickens.

By law, poultry grown for meat is hormone-free and cage-free (although not necessarily free-range). Do Good chickens are “raised in Humane Society-approved conditions.” However, earning Certified Humane or Animal Welfare Approved certification would be a valuable next step in confirming that Do Good Chicken is sustainable in more than just its food supply. Because surplus groceries include both organic and conventionally grown foods, the chickens raised on supermarket surplus cannot be certified organic.

Goodr

Goodr is a Black-owned waste management and hunger relief company that grew out of a local initiative to feed people experiencing food insecurity in Atlanta. Today, Goodr partners with companies across the country to provide the technology and logistical support to track and donate surplus food while earning charitable tax benefits. Their solutions include food pantries and pop-up grocery stores in food-insecure neighborhoods, meal deliveries, and student snack packs. They also compost food that can’t be upcycled.

Green Urban Lunch Box Hard Cider

In Utah, an upcycling partnership produces the annual, limited-edition Green Urban Lunch Box Hard Cider. Utah’s only hard cidery, Mountain West is a family-owned cidery specializing in local ingredients. The Green Urban Lunch Box (GLUB) is a Salt Lake City food justice nonprofit that, among other programs, connects urban fruit tree owners with volunteer harvesters to direct surplus fruit to people who need it. Every year, GLUB and Mountain West pair up to create a limited-edition seasonal batch of about 300 gallons of hyperlocal hard apple cider using surplus B-grade apples and volunteer labor. For every bottle sold, Mountain West directs $5 to support GLUB’s programs.

ZENB

ZENB takes a “snout to tail” approach but slides it down the food chain to more efficiently use plants for food. They use a proprietary process to make plant-based pastas and sauces with simple ingredients, using as much of the whole plant as possible. That includes plant parts that normally go to waste: skins, seeds, and stems. The company has a long history of resource efficiency. ZENB was founded more than 200 years ago to make vinegar out of a byproduct of the sake brewing process.

Too Good To Go

Too Good To Go made their U.S. launch in New York City in 2000. They have since expanded to 13 major cities across the country, including Seattle; Boston; Washington, D.C.; San Francisco; Chicago; Austin; and Baltimore. In each area, restaurants and supermarkets offer discounted foods that they would otherwise be unable to sell. Customers use the app to browse the offerings and make purchases that they then pick up. Some locations have more selection than others, and consumers need to be speedy and flexible to grab the best deals, but in a case study, the Yo! Sushi chain saved 110,000 meals from the dumpster. Too Good To Go estimates that it has connected consumers with more than 194 million meals that would have been tossed.

Originally published on December 16, 2021, this article was updated in January 2023.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/creative-companies-upcycling-food-earth911/feed/ 0
What Makes a Product Sustainable? https://eco-shopping.co.uk/what-makes-a-product-sustainable/ https://eco-shopping.co.uk/what-makes-a-product-sustainable/#respond Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:34:09 +0000 https://eco-shopping.co.uk/what-makes-a-product-sustainable/

We talk a lot about the importance of sustainability and making sure the products we purchase are sustainable. But what is it, exactly, that makes a product sustainable?

As you might suspect, “sustainable” can mean different things to different companies and individuals. If you want to be an informed consumer, you may find it helpful to consider the different aspects of sustainability.

What “Sustainability” Means

A simple definition of sustainability is the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level. For a product to be sustainable, it must be possible to produce and/or consume it in a way that doesn’t result in harm or destruction. If the production of a product requires nonrenewable resources, damages the environment, or results in harm to individuals or society, it is unlikely to be considered sustainable.

A product is usually considered sustainable if it:

  • Doesn’t deplete natural, nonrenewable resources: A sustainable product is made from renewable resources; in other words, resources that can’t be fully depleted.
  • Doesn’t directly harm the environment: The production, distribution, and/or consumption of the product uses as little energy as possible, and minimizes and responsibly disposes of waste. Almost no action is completely free from environmental impact, so most environmentally conscious companies strive to minimize negative impact.

A more complex aspect of sustainability is economic sustainability, which can refer to how a business operates. Economically sustainable businesses allow other businesses to compete and flourish. Broader economic sustainability allows a country’s growth to remain consistent for many years, rather than accelerating and declining in volatile or destructive patterns.

Sustainability Through Processes vs. Actions

Some companies optimize their processes and resources for sustainability, while others improve sustainability through actions; some companies strive for both.

Through process and resource optimization, some companies choose vendors, materials, production methods, hiring options, and make other business decisions specifically because they lend themselves to sustainability. This often requires extensive due diligence and may result in higher initial production costs.

Companies may also strive to improve their sustainability through actions that are separate from the manufacture of their product or the delivery of their service. For example, Water Watch Company provides clean water to an individual in need for a lifetime with each purchase; to date, they’ve donated more than 120 million gallons of clean water.

Other industries take action to offset an otherwise unsustainable model. For example, some airlines participate in carbon offset programs that plant trees or take other actions to help compensate for the negative environmental impact of travel.

Is This Product Sustainable?

First, check the label. Often, labels on a product will convey how the product is made and what it’s environmental impact might be. For example, you can look for labels that indicate that the product:

  • Was made from recycled materials;
  • Was made using renewable resources;
  • Is 100% biodegradable, or;
  • Was manufactured using ethically sourced labor.

You may also see marks of approval from formal standards and organizations, like the EPA or the World Fair Trade Organization. Several organizations around the world identify, analyze, and label the relative sustainability of different products. For example,

  • The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) provides standard reporting guidelines that organizations can voluntarily follow. The guidelines outline economic, environmental, and social impact for individual products and the organization overall.
  • The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) provides international standards for environmental impact.
  • Many countries have national standards for sustainability that local companies may be legally required to follow.
  • You can also check CSRHub.com, a private database that ranks corporate sustainability and social goals.

Other factors that help determine a product’s sustainability are more difficult to measure. For example, is this product potentially contributing to the development of a pseudo-monopoly? Was this product developed by the hands of a mistreated workforce?

You’ll need to research the company to know for sure since you won’t find that information on a label. So, it’s a good time to check the GRI, UNEP, or CSRHub sites.

Is This Business Sustainable?

You can think of sustainability in terms of individual products and overall organizations. For example, a company may produce a single product that is not sustainable due to its environmental impact, but the organization’s broader efforts improve the company’s sustainability. Conversely, a single product may be environmentally friendly, but the organization’s hiring practices,  economic activities, or overall environmental impact may be destructive.

It’s important to acknowledge both product and organizational sustainability in your research. One way to determine organizational sustainability is to review the company’s most recent sustainability report, which you may be able to find on their website. Among U.S. publicly traded companies, 96% of S&P 500 and 81% of Russell 1000 are now publishing sustainability reports. In these sustainability reports, you’ll learn about the company’s environmental impact, hiring practices, and steps they’re taking to improve their sustainability as an organization.

As consumers increasingly demand sustainable products and services, more companies will focus on their business’ sustainability. With a better perspective on the definition of sustainability, you can make better choices as a consumer.

This article was originally published on July 7, 2020. We updated some links in February 8, 2023.

credit :Source link

]]>
https://eco-shopping.co.uk/what-makes-a-product-sustainable/feed/ 0